Wildfire Wednesdays #75: Post-fire Water Impacts

Happy Holidays, Fireshed Community!

Today’s guest writer, Rachel Bean of the Forest Stewards Guild, joined us back in September to discuss the connection between forest health and healthy water. Click here to revisit that blog post and refresh your memory on the basics of a watershed. Today, Rachel will be examining potential post-wildfire impacts on water.

This Wildfire Wednesday features information on:

  • Post-fire debris flows

  • Water-supply reservoir impacts

  • Water quality following a wildfire


Fire and Floods

Schematic diagram courtesy of Larramendy and Soloneski, 2019

Soil comes in all shapes and sizes. More specifically, soil comes in all different textures (particle size), porosities (the amount of space between particles), and structures (the way particles of different sizes are arranged in layers). The combination of all of these physical factors determines how much water the soil can absorb when it rains or snows and how much water it can hold in the form of soil moisture. A complete soil profile is made up of a mixture of minerals, organic matter, water, and air.

Soils are important components of ecosystem sustainability because they supply air and water, nutrients, and mechanical support for plants. In turn, plants stabilize the soil with their vast root systems. By absorbing water during infiltration, soils provide water storage as well as delivering water slowly from upstream slopes to drainages and channels where it contributes to streamflow (Neary et al. 2005).

Schematic courtesy of American Forestry Foundation in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture

When a wildfire burns through an area with lots of fuel (combustible organic material such as tree leaves and needles, grasses, twigs, branches, and logs) on the ground, it sets the stage for that fire to burn hot and then smolder. This transfers quite a bit of heat downward into and through the soil. The greatest increase in temperature occurs at, or near, the soil surface. The more the soil heats, the more likely it is to experience destruction of its organic material and large changes in its mineral layer.

Ash and organic oils from burned plants coat the soil mineral particles, creating what is called a hydrophobic soil. This means that water is no longer absorbed into the soil, but rather runs off it along the surface. Instead of acting like a sponge, the soil acts like the basin of a kitchen sink.

As water runs off the soil and gathers momentum, it also gathers dirt, ash, rocks, sticks, and larger material. A trickle becomes a muddy flood called a debris flow. While debris flows can be triggered by events other than wildfire, they are more likely to occur following a high-severity wildfire which renders the soil hydrophobic.

In the southwestern Rocky Mountains, moderate to severe forest fires can increase the likelihood of debris flow events by consuming rainfall intercepting canopy, generating ash, and forming water-repellant soils resulting in decreased infiltration and increased runoff and erosion. Debris flows, a destructive form of mass wasting, create significant hazards for people, and cause severe damage to watersheds and water resources
— Manuel Lopez, US Geological Survey

Impacts on Water-Supply Reservoirs

Debris flows can overfill riverbeds and drainages, tear out trees and move boulders, and can destroy homes, businesses, and entire towns in a slurry of sludge. They can also fill water-supply reservoirs with a heavy load of sediment, taking the reservoir off-line in the short-term and forcing municipal water suppliers to rely on a secondary water source for residents, shortening the reservoir lifetime, increasing maintenance costs, and potentially rendering reservoirs unusable for storage or potability. Several municipalities across the state of New Mexico have had to spent millions of dollars to dredge their reservoirs following sedimentation events. Visit the Greater Santa Fe Fireshed Coalition’s Source Water webpage to learn more.


Post-fire Water Quality

Water quality can be compromised by wildfires both during active burning and for months and years afterward. As discussed above, burned watersheds are prone to increased flooding and erosion, which can negatively affect water-supply reservoirs, water quality, and drinking-water treatment processes.

Sediment which is transported off of the land and into waterways during post-fire flooding and erosion often contains a lot of nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, major ions, and metals. These elements can make treating water to make it safe for drinking more difficult; they can also result in algae outbreaks, which reduce the amount of dissolved oxygen available to fish and other aquatic species. The use of fire retardants during suppression of a wildfire could also have significant effects on downstream nutrients.

Runoff from burned areas contains ash, which may have significant effects on the chemistry of receiving waters such as lakes, wetlands, reservoirs, rivers and. Runoff from burned areas also produces higher nitrate, organic carbon, and sediment levels, warmer temperatures, and more unpredictable streamflows. The increased turbidity (cloudiness caused by suspended material) of this runoff leads to changes in source-water chemistry that can alter drinking-water treatment. Heightened iron and manganese concentrations may increase chemical treatment requirements and produce larger volumes of sludge, both of which raise water-treatment operating costs.

Wildfire Wednesdays #74: FEMA Grant Programs

Hi Fireshed Community,

As temperatures continue to drop, and we head into Winter, it is a great time to do some planning for next year. Winter offers us some time to get proactive by planning wildfire adaptation projects and applying for funding to support this work. With that in mind, this edition of Wildfire Wednesdays shares some information about the well-funded grants that are administered through FEMA.

This Wildfire Wednesdays shares information on:

  • The variety of FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grants

  • The process for applying to FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grants

  • Eligibility requirements for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grants

  • Resources for learning more about FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grants

Best,

Gabe

Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants

The Department of Homeland Security’s FEMA HMA programs present a critical opportunity to reduce the risk to communities from natural hazards while simultaneously reducing reliance on Federal disaster recovery funds. The HMA program includes three grant types for qualifying mitigation activities, especially those that mitigate flood risk in areas that previously experienced losses and help prevent future damages. Within the HMA program, the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program will be receiving a substantial increase in available funding that can support wildfire mitigation projects.

FEMA offers both pre- and post-disaster funding opportunities. Pre-disaster mitigation opportunities allow communities to plan for future disasters and enjoy the benefits of achieving a more resilient landscape before a natural disaster strikes. Post-disaster mitigation opportunities allow communities to take advantage of larger pots of funding that may become available in the aftermath of a federally-declared disaster.

Non-disaster/annual grants

  • Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC)

  • Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)

Disaster grants

  • Hazard Mitigation Grant Program

  • Hazard Mitigation Grant Program – Post fire

From The Nature Conservancy’s report: “Promoting Nature-Based Hazard Mitigation through FEMA Mitigation Grants.

“Natural Hazard Mitigation – any sustainable action that reduces or eliminates long-term risk to people and property from future natural disasters.”

Two types of activities within Hazard Mitigation Assistance:

  • Planning – breaks the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage

  • Projects – are long-term solutions that reduce the impact of disasters in the future

These grants require substantial administrative capacity and provide additional funding (up to 10%) to support this workload. There is funding within the HMA grant program to support project scoping in the years leading up to an application.

How to Begin the Application Process

In state of New Mexico FEMA funds pass through the Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) as sub-grants. Because of this, it is important to have early communication with the State Hazard Mitigation Officer, and the state agency’s grants team, to develop consensus on project approach.

State Hazard Mitigation Officer and Unit Manager: Chelsea Morganti, chelsea.morganti@state.nm.us

You will want to reach out to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer before August because a Notice of Interest are typically due in early October for the annual programs (BRIC and FMA). Although this deadline is a ways out, get started with project planning early and make sure that you are working with an entity with a current FEMA Hazard Mitigation Plan. A hazard mitigation plan for the applicant or sub applicant is essential to all HMA programs.

Eligibility

Talk to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer early to discuss eligibility. In general, a current FEMA Hazard Mitigation Plan for the project area is a core requirement. Many county governments have FEMA Hazard Mitigation Plans and are eligible applicants.

From The Nature Conservancy’s report: “Promoting Nature-Based Hazard Mitigation through FEMA Mitigation Grants.

Learn More!

To gain a better understanding for how HMA grants are a viable funding source for nature-based solutions to hazard mitigation, read The Nature Conservancy’s report, “Promoting Nature-Based Hazard Mitigation through FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grants.”

Watch this video with (@ timestamp: 3.00.00 ) Chelsea Morganti, New Mexico’s Hazard Mitigation Officer with the Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management from the 2021 Wildland Urband Fire Summit.

Check out the Hazard Mitigation Assistance Guidance webpage.

Reach out to Gabe Kohler, gabe@forestguild.org, with the Fire Adapted New Mexico learning network for support.

Wildfire Wednesdays #73: The Ecological Role of Fire

Hello Fireshed community,

Happy Wednesday and a happy Thanksgiving to you and your family! This year we’re feeling particularly grateful for the beautiful landscapes of Northern New Mexico that we live and recreate in and the fire personnel that keep our ecosystems and communities safe. While we often share resources on how to prepare for or cope with wildfire, this week we wanted to share with you information regarding the ecological role of fire. The role of fire varies across landscapes and many ecosystems have evolved to have specific and beneficial relationships with periodic wildlife. Keep reading to learn more!

This week’s Wildfire Wednesday features information on:

  • How fire benefits ecosystems

  • Fire adapted species

  • Fire return intervals

Best,

Liz


How fire benefits ecosystems

Periodic, low-intensity fire can have many positive effects across ecosystems, keep reading to learn more or click on any of these sources to dive deeper: Benefits of Fire (Cal Fire); Fire Effects on Soil (NAU); Fire Ecology (BLM); Fire’s Natural Role (USFWS); The Ecological Benefits of Fire (National Geographic).

Photo credit: Sharon Hood

  • “Cleans” the forest floor

    When low-intensity fire travels through the understory it removes the layer of dead or decaying plants. By removing this debris, it opens up space on the forest floor where growth of new plants is encouraged and it reduces the likelihood of high-intensity wildfire.

  • Returns nutrients to soil

    Although overall some nutrients on-site are lost during a fire, fire actually increases the amount of available nutrients in an ecosystem. Soil fertility increases after low-intensity fire as the fire chemically converts nutrients in dead plants that would otherwise take much longer to decay and return to the soil.

  • Increases diversity

    When a forest is without fire it leads to over-crowding, preventing sunlight from reaching the forest floor and creating intense competition for water and available nutrients. In the aftermath of low-intensity fire, gaps in the canopy are created allowing sunlight through and there is more available nutrients and water. Low intensity fires can also eliminate invasive/noxious weed infestations, allowing an opportunity for native plants to grow and establish. Some native species actually require fire for seed germination!

  • Creates new habitat

    Fire removes thick brush, maintains open meadows, and thins out dense forests, all creating new habitat for animals and birds. Additionally, those trees that do not survive fire create new habitat for insects and cavity nesting birds and animals.

  • Kills pests and diseases

    Fire kills populations of beetles, mites and other harmful pests which reduces disease and keeps forests healthier.

Photo credit: Harvey Mudd College


Fire adapted species

Many of our beloved plant species are fire-adapted, meaning that they have “life history traits that help them survive wildfire or to use resources created by wildfire.” There are different categories of fire-adapted plants based on the traits that allow them to survive or flourish with wildfire (from Fire Ecology by the Bureau of Land Management)

Ponderosa pines, an example of a “resister” fire-adapted species (Credit: John Marshall)

  • Resisters are the species that can survive moderate to low-intensity fires with little to no damage. Some adaptations of Resisters include: thick bark to shield them from fire; deep roots protected from fire; the shedding of their lower branches to prevent fire from climbing; and moist, short needles or leaves that are hard to burn. Some examples include: ponderosa pine, sugar pine, and Douglas-fir.

Aspen resprouting after a recent fire in Utah (Credit: Karen Mock)

  • Sprouters are the species that endure fire. Sprouters resprout from their roots, trunks, limbs, and/or crown after a burn. Many shrubs are sprouters. Some of these species also have hard shelled seeds relying on fire to crack them open. While the parent plant may be injured in a fire, the new sprouts are able to grow in nutrient rich soil and have less competition. Some examples include: oak, aspen, and madrone.

Lodgepole pines, an example of a “seeder” species, requires fire for their seeds to germinate.

  • Seeders are adapted to evade fire by shedding lots of seeds that sprout after fire. These sprouts thrive from the rich nutrients recycled into the soil. Right after a fire is a prime time for a plant to disperse its seeds and germinate because there is more space to grow and less competition for resources like sunlight, water, and nutrients. Many Seeders are dependent on fire to create the habitat needed for their seedlings to sprout and grow. Seeders are not invaders because they already inhabited the area before the fire and their population does not spread as rapidly as invaders. Some examples include: buckbrush, lodgepole pine, and manzanita.

Filling the “invader” niche, lupine will take advantage of recently burned areas (Credit: NPS)

  • Invaders take over recently burned areas. Their populations are either limited or unknown prior to fire. Invaders tend to have seeds that are highly dispersive by wind, animals, or people. Many invaders are noxious weeds that take over areas after disturbances such as a fire, flood, or development. Some examples include: star thistle, fireweed, scotch broom, and lupine.

White fir trees are “avoiders”, they tend to grow in areas where fire does not frequently occur.

  • Avoiders are least adapted to fire because they grow in areas where fire does not normally occur. They are typically found near water or in high elevations. Avoiders are a late successional species, thus they are not found in recently burned areas. Avoiders have thin bark, shallow roots, and lots of resin, which can help a fire spread. Few avoiders survive moderate to high intensity fires. Some examples include: white fir, vine maple, western red cedar, and western hemlock.

To learn more about the different traits plants develop to survive wildfire or use it to their advantage check out this Britannica article “Playing with Wildfire: 5 Amazing Adaptations of Pyrophytic Plants”


Fire Return Interval

A fire return interval is the (historical or natural) time between fires in a defined area, usually at the scale of a point, stand or relatively small landscape area. For example, fires in ponderosa pine communities burned naturally on a cycle of one fire every 5 to 25 years. This frequent fire burned the grasses, shrubs, and small trees, and maintained an open stand of larger ponderosa pine trees.

Check out this table from the Forest Service detailing fire regime characteristics for different ecosystem types in the Southwest.

Map showing the historic fire return interval in years for Arizona and New Mexico (Credit: HISTORIC FIRE RETURN INTERVALS FOR ARIZONA and NEW MEXICO: A REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE FOR SOUTHWESTERN LAND MANAGERS)

Wildfire Wednesdays #72: Wildland Urban Fire Summit (WUFS) Wrap-Up

Hello Fireshed community,

Happy Wednesday! We hope you’re having a good week and enjoying the nice weather we’ve been having. Many prescribed burns are occurring throughout Northern New Mexico at the moment, check out NM Fire Info to stay informed and read our previous blog post on prescribed fires to learn more on why these burns are important. If you’re experiencing smoke from the prescribed burns, visit our Smoke & HEPA Filter Loan Program page on the FACNM website to learn more. This week we’re reflecting and sharing resources from the recent New Mexico Wildland Urban Fire Summit: Community Resilience & Recovery (WUFS). There were a lot of great resources shared so keep reading to learn more!

This week’s Wildfire Wednesday features:

  • Talks of interest from WUFS 2021

  • The recent Wildfire Science and Values Peer Learning Session

Best,

Liz


New Mexico Wildland Urban Fire Summit: Community Resilience & Recovery

The NM Wildland Urban Fire Summit is an forum for wildfire preparedness and planning where a network of experts and peers share successes and lessons learned from “living with fire” in an effort to assist one another with fire resiliency goals and learn innovative ways to adapt communities to wildfires. At this year’s summit, presenters included those academic researchers, private business owners, hazard mitigation officers, fire instructors, forest service personnel and more. To see a full agenda from both days of the conference click here.

Talks of interest

Turning Up the Heat: Tools for Understanding, Exploring, and Reducing Wildfire Risks (Keynote), Presented by Kimiko Barrett, Ph.D.

  • Dr. Barrett, wildfire researcher and policy lead for Headwaters Economics, shared tools for long-term community resiliency that have been developed with federal, state, local and private partners. The tools discussed include the Wildfire Risk to Communities website and the Unequal Impacts of Wildfire Risk tool which uses data to show in which counties people could be disproportionately impacted from wildfires.

Beyond Grant-Writing Panic: Building the Collaborative Infrastructure to Bolster Long-Term Forest and Community Resilience from Wildfire in Taos County, Presented by J.R. Logan, Taos County WUI Coordinator.

  • This talk highlights the work being done in Taos County on improving the infrastructure to move money efficiently to high-priority forestry projects despite administrative hurdles and planning obstacles. Collaborative, community groups have been coordinating to “look at specific areas in a specific geography with specific partners and start picking away at treatments” and the county is working on aligning local priorities with those from federal agencies and building those into the CWPP.

Find the above talks and others here - Day 1, Part A (Dr. Kimiko Barrett @ 11:23 minutes; J.R. Logan @ 58:14 minutes)

Achieving Landscape Scale Piñon-Juniper Ecosystem Treatment Efficiency: Seeking a Smarter Use of WUI Dollars in PJ Stewardship. Presented by Jan-Willem Jansens, Ecotone Landscape Planning, LLC

  • Jan-Willem addresses several questions regarding the current state of piñion-juniper ecosystems, the challenges being faced, and how to effectively manage these ecosystems.

Find the above talk and more here - Day 1, Part B (Jan-Willem Jansens @ 3:37 minutes)

Firehorses: How Individuals, Communities, Fire Personnel, and Governments can Plan, Prepare, and Execute Equine Evacuations Safely. Presented by Madeleine Carey, Graduate HA, Watermelon Mountain Pony Club

  • Madeleine shares her lessons learned from helping with horse evacuations during the Las Conchas fire and her experiences with the Watermelon Mountain Pony Club. Her presentation contains many resources that may be of interest to individuals looking to prepare for equine evacuations in the case of wildfires. You can find her powerpoint presentation with links here.

Wildland Fire in the Middle School Classroom. Presented by Christine Mares, Wildland Fire Instructor, Southwest Fire Science Consortium & Mollie Parsons, Cerise Consulting.

  • This presentation shares information on the Fire Ecology Learning Lab Middle School Curriculum that is in development. The curriculum includes low/no-cost lessons for middle school classrooms with themes including biotic communities, wildland fire, and wildland fire management.

Hazard Mitigation Funding Opportunities in New Mexico. Presented by Chelsea Morganti, CFM, State Hazard Mitigation Officer, NMDHSEM

  • Chelsea introduces the different funding opportunities available in New Mexico for hazard mitigation. She explains what is a natural hazard in New Mexico, what qualifies as hazard mitigation, the pathways of grants, who is eligible to apply, match requirements, project types and more. This is a great resource for anyone interested in funding opportunities for various types of hazard mitigation, you can find her powerpoint presentation here.

Find the above talks and more here - Day 2 (Madeline Carey @ 2:03:52; Christine Mares & Mollie Parsons @ 2:14:32; Chelsea Morganti @ 3:00:41)


Wildfire Science and Values Peer Learning Session

Hosted by the National Forest Foundation in partnership with the Montana Forest Collaboration Network

During this peer learning session, speakers will:

  • Build understanding about the spectrum of complementary actions, based on available science, to protect the built environment and community values from wildfire, improve the ecological resilience of our landscapes, and improve the safety and effectiveness of wildfire management;

  • Discuss the concepts of landscape resilience, the wildland urban interface and the home ignition zone, fire management options, and the roles they play in reducing fire risk;

  • Address why fire needs to be restored to the landscape;

  • Consider the values that could be lost and how they relate to fire; and

  • Discuss how to increase the options for fire managers to implement integrated active management.

Moderated by Dr. Colin Hardy, U.S. Forest Service, Missoula Fire Sciences Lab. Speakers include:

  • Dr. Mark Finney, U.S. Forest Service Fire Lab;

  • Dr. Jack Cohen, U.S. Forest Service Fire Lab (ret.); and

  • Barbara (Bea) Day, U.S. Forest Service Portland NIMO Incident Commander.

Greater Santa Fe Watershed South Aztec Prescribed Burn Wrap-up

Smoke from the South Aztec prescribe burn travelling to the southeast of the watershed, away from the city of Santa Fe (visible on the right).

Last Wednesday, October 27, the Santa Fe National Forest conducted a prescribed burn in the Santa Fe Watershed with many partners including Tesuque Pueblo, the Forest Stewards Guild, Forest Stewards Youth Corps, Santa Fe County, and the City of Santa Fe Fire Department. The burn unit, the South Aztec, had been previously thinned to reduce fuel loads and was adjacent to several other units that have been treated in the past few years. This successful prescribed fire achieved its objectives to “reduce the risk of a high-severity crown fire, to protect the municipal water supply and restore sustainable watershed conditions… [and to] increase herbaceous ground cover to improve long-term soil stability and vegetative diversity.” 

Some of the larger fuels igniting during the South Aztec burn.

Prescribed burns, especially those that occur close to communities and high-value resources, require a tremendous amount of planning and coordination, much of which is not obvious to the public eye. When a burn plan is written a prescription is developed that sets ranges for environmental and weather conditions that must be met for the burn to take place. In preparation for a burn personnel must retrieve weather forecasts, set up smoke monitors, put up signs, notify the public via news releases, identify any archeological or historical sites, identify threatened or endangered species, involve dispatch support, prepare the control line, coordinate with partners, and more.  

Because of the watershed’s proximity to Santa Fe, the Forest Service works closely with the NM Environmental Department’s Air Quality Bureau and the New Mexico Department of Health. Coordination calls with these agencies are held before, during, and after prescribed burns and they must comply with state regulations on air quality. During the fire, hourly weather readings are taken on-site to make sure that conditions are still within the prescribed ranges. If the weather moves outside of prescribed ranges, i.e., winds grow stronger than allowed in the plan, the burning is halted or contingency plans are enacted. 

The smoke from this prescribed burn was visible from many locations across the Greater Santa Fe Fireshed. Although there are always risks associated with smoke, the effects of smoke from prescribed fire are far less than those from wildfires. The Forest Service worked closely with meteorologists from the National Weather Service to identify an optimal window where wind direction and speed would help push the bulk of the smoke up and away from town. The Fire Manager for the Aztec Springs prescribed burn said, “some communities were affected to the East and South, but the smoke levels were nothing compared to a wildland fire the same amount of acres would produce during typical June hot weather conditions.” 

Forest Stewards Guild Fire and Fuels Manager Sam Berry inspects the holding line to make sure no embers travel outside of the burn unit area.

Some members of the public expressed concern about the wind conditions on the day of the prescribed burn. Wind is one of the most important variables that fire managers take into consideration when planning a burn. The Fire Manager said, “the wind direction played a key part of the success of the burn… the wind blew the smoke into already previous treated areas and, due to the great work from the holding resources, they were able to keep the hot embers that caused spot fires small and manageable...the sustained wind kept the smoke from moving into most of our sensitive areas like schools, hospitals, highways, airport, etc.” The unit also received light precipitation before the burn which reduced the burning intensity of ground fuels, bettering the conditions for controlled burning. 

Historic wildfire suppression and a lack of previous treatments in a fire-adapted ecosystem like the Santa Fe National Forest has left the landscape within the watershed vulnerable to catastrophic wildfire. If wildfires were to occur in the watershed during the typical summer season, nearly 81% of the forest would be “subject to high-severity torching and crown fire”. Intense wildfire within the watershed would cause debris flows which could compromise the drinking water and lead to a dam breach, putting the city of Santa Fe at risk for severe flooding. Thinning and burning projects within the watershed are critical to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire and protect our municipal water source. 

View of Nichols Reservoir from the South Aztec burn unit during the prescribed burn on October 27, 2021.

The Santa Fe Watershed is a precious resource to our community and the land management treatments that are conducted within the watershed are carefully planned and conducted over decades. The diligent planning, highly trained and experienced personnel, and optimal weather conditions all aligned to make this burn successful as part of an ongoing partnership to protect our watershed.